Binance and Bybity say no network PI: Expert reveals real reasons

With more than 47 million users, PI Network is not intrigued as it is divided. However, this crypto, which carried the ambition with mobile friendship, remains massively accepted in the main exchange platforms such as binance or bybity. This absence challenges the transparency of the project and its strategic elections otherwise the standards required by centralized stock exchanges and institutional investors.

Tokenomics considered to be opaque analysts

One of the main brakes on the list of PI on Binance or Bybity is based on insufficient clarity considered critical of some experts.

Analyst Thus, Altcoin claims on the social network X (formerly Twitter) on March 22, 2025 that “the central team still clearly did not define the mechanisms of blocking or burning”, but the elements necessary for the credibility of the blockchain project.

This opacity prevents platforms from precisely assessing the risks associated with the offer in circulation, a criterion that has become necessary at the age of increased regulation in this industry.

Such distrust was reinforced by a recent decision that surprised the observer: the abolition of 10 million chips from the network caused a decline in the offer to 6.77 billion.

This overall absence of official justification has raised doubts about the project team’s intentions, because some evoke manipulation with an offer before the possible liberation of chips.

The exchange platforms, in search of solid and transparent projects, are cautious in the face of this administration considered too unilateral.

Here are the main points of friction underlined analytics:

• The absence of tokenomics transparency: the rules for distribution, blocking and destruction of chips remain vague;
• Unexplained reduction in circulation bid: no official press release accompanied by downloading millions of chips;
• Concerns about administration: strategic decisions taken without consultation or public communication;
• Risk perceived by stock exchanges: Such opacity goes against the standards needed for lists on large platforms.

Strategic rejection of input standards

In addition to economic uncertainties, the absence of a network on Binance or Bybity could also be explained by a strategic selection of the project team. According to several sources, PI Network has refused the idea of ​​paying the costs required by certain platforms.

This decision would be motivated by the desire to maintain the independence of the project towards traditional commercial logic.

“Refusing to observe the financial requirements of exchange can be considered an ethical location,” notes Dr. Altcoin. This reminds that this posture is barely sustainable due to the imperatives of transparency and regulation of crypto.

Thus, this non -conformist attitude, if it refers to a part of the community, complicates the perspectives of the evaluation on the main platforms.

In the absence of an extract for recognized centralized exchange, the liquidity of the token remains limited, preventing massive adoption or institutional speculation. Will the experimental phase exceed the integration into conventional exchange circuits?

The development of the project will undoubtedly depend on its ability to clarify its economic structure and create a more constructive dialogue with cryptocurrency platforms such as binance and bybit. Otherwise, PI could remain a promising but marginal community project on the edge of the market, where the requirement of transparency has become the norm.

Renunciation

The words and opinions expressed in this article are involved only by their author and should not be considered investment counseling. Do your own research before any investment decision.